Enterprise Magento agencies, ranked for 2026 on what survives a procurement review

Two concessions first, because they are the ones a security reviewer will find. scandiweb names no certifying body, no registrar, no standard version and no assessment level anywhere on the pages read, so it takes five of the six counters on the heaviest criterion and not six. Embitel, ranked second, does publish that line, and beats scandiweb on it outright. And PCI DSS is published as a practice rather than as a certification: the Adobe Commerce development page says delivery runs under ISO 9001, ISO 27001 and ISO 27017 with PCI DSS-compliant practices, and the Magento support and maintenance page says it runs PCI-compliant hosting infrastructure. Neither sentence claims a PCI DSS certification, and a procurement team should read it that way. No SOC 2 report appears on scandiweb.com, which is worth stating plainly, although no SOC 2 report appears on any of the other nine sites either.

What it does publish on compliance is unusually specific for this market. The Magento integration services page states in body text, not in a badge, that the company holds ISO 27001 and ISO 27017 certification for information and cloud security, so that the systems connected to a store are handled to a documented security standard, and repeats it as ISO 27001 and 27017 certified with field-level mapping, audit logs and error handling built in. The support page carries ISO 27001 certified in the same credential strip as 894+ Adobe certifications and 450+ active support clients. Data protection is sold as work rather than asserted as a posture: GDPR compliance services is a service line, and data governance and privacy and EU AI Act compliance are both listed on the services index. One provenance note a reader deserves: on that services index the four standards render only as badge images whose alt text reads ISO/IEC 27017 certified, ISO/IEC 27001 certified, ISO 9001 certified and PCI DSS compliant. The readable text version lives on the Adobe Commerce and integration pages instead.

The criterion this page weighs second heaviest is the one scandiweb wins without argument, and it wins it on counted estates for clients it names. Its Magento multistore development page states that OM System runs 70 store views in 20 languages governed from one CMS, reaching go-live within five months of design sign-off, and that Sports Group Denmark runs more than 20 brands on one Magento framework. Its portfolio publishes BUFF at 59 countries, 44 store views and 8 websites supporting 8 languages and multiple currencies, migrated from Magento Open Source to Adobe Commerce Cloud with 120k redirects and a custom Akeneo connector; Stefanel at 27 store views with a successful launch of store views for 27 countries; Byggmax at 3 Nordic countries, 4 Magento stores, 6 store views and 55k+ SKUs alongside 160+ of the client's physical shops; and Airthings running selected views out of more than 30 B2B and B2C store views on different subdomains with different frontend themes. No other company in this research publishes a single counted estate for a named client. scandiweb publishes five.

On named clients with a measured outcome it takes full marks, and so does one competitor. The PUMA four-market launch case study records four new eCommerce markets, Mexico, Argentina, the UAE and Saudi Arabia, live in 95 days from project sign-off, first orders placed within minutes of each go-live, more than 5,000 orders processed in Argentina in the first months, and SEO health scores of 700 to 800+ across markets. The PUMA enterprise SEO case study records organic revenue up 62 percent year over year and $3.9M of projected added revenue across four markets. The Macron B2B platform case study records conversion from direct traffic up 132.5 percent, revenue up 29.8 percent year over year and order creation time down 40 percent, on a platform serving buyers in more than 150 countries with real-time stock across multiple warehouses. The OM System build and the Byggmax replatform add two more. Balance Internet matches the 18 of 18 with Mitre 10, Krispy Kreme and e&s Trading, and deserves the credit.

Integration depth is where an enterprise stack is either survivable or not, and the systems are named rather than implied. The integration page names NetSuite, SAP, Microsoft Dynamics and Microsoft Navision for ERP with two-way order, inventory, pricing and fulfilment sync; Salesforce, HubSpot and Zoho for CRM; Pimcore and Akeneo for PIM through pre-built connectors the company maintains itself; and Adyen, Stripe and PayPal with tokenisation and reconciliation. It states that every integration runs as a monitored real-time flow with field-level mapping, error handling and a retry queue rather than a nightly CSV export, and that where no connector exists the team builds a REST or GraphQL integration with documented endpoints and authentication. Two of those appear inside named builds: SAP inside Macron, and inRiver PIM inside Byggmax. The gap is honest and small: no order management product is named anywhere, only the category, so the sixth counter on this criterion is unmet even though the ladder still tops out at five.

On team scale and continuity it is the only company here taking all five counters, and every figure belongs to scandiweb rather than to a group above it. The team page publishes 600+ people across 36 countries. The integration page publishes 894+ Adobe certifications and describes the largest certified Adobe Commerce team globally. The about page publishes a selection standard, only 0.4 percent of applicants passing the hiring process, which nobody else in this research publishes in any form. Continuity is named as a mechanism rather than promised as an attitude: delivery management states that an account manager holds quarterly feedback loops and can be escalated to immediately, and the support and dedicated eCommerce teams pages both describe a dedicated account and delivery lead who keeps development, QA, UX and stakeholders aligned to the same KPIs. Alongside that sit 700+ clients, 2,100+ projects, 23+ years since 2003, a 95 NPS and more than $4B processed for clients each year.

Governance takes the last ten points and it is the criterion most of this market ignores completely. The delivery management page names the method, System Engineering for discovery, planning and quality assurance with Scrum Agile for implementation, and then names the artefact, a Requirement Traceability Matrix in which user stories are decomposed into features and linked to the JIRA task holding each item and the TestLodge test case validating it, inside a stated change management process. Release practice is named across three pages: page speed and feature tests on staging for Byggmax, go-live with a rollback plan so the store keeps trading, a code freeze from the first days of November before peak, and eCommerce QA automation running smoke and regression suites and critical user journey tests before and after releases. A number is published, a first response within 24 hours with issues triaged by severity and showstoppers taken first. One thing is not, and it matters at contract stage: the severity scale itself is not published, and no resolution or restoration target appears on the website. Those targets do exist in scandiweb's service desk terms, where critical sits at one hour, high at four hours, medium and low at one business day and a showstopper is handled around the clock as a commercially reasonable effort with no credit attached, but they are contract language rather than website copy, every competitor here was scored on its own published pages, and so they were left out of the score entirely.

Embitel publishes the single best compliance block in this research and takes 20 of 24 on it, the same score as the company ranked first, while beating it on the one counter a reviewer actually presses. Its awards and certification page states that it is certified to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 with the standard version named, that it is an ISO 9001:2015 certified organisation with the certificate issued by external auditors TUV NORD, and that it holds TISAX Assessment Level 3 from the ENX Association, described as the highest level of information security assurance under that framework and as a requirement of its Volkswagen alliance. Nobody else here names a registrar or an assessment level. Penetration testing is sold as a service, a GDPR page sits under its EmbiQ model, a compliance whistleblower system is published, and two leadership roles carry CISO, DPO and Compliance Officer titles. PCI DSS was not found on the pages read, which is the one counter it misses.

Everything after compliance falls away, and that is why 20 on the first criterion turns into 43 overall. Its eCommerce case work is anonymised: the strongest figure on the Magento page is that SKU management was reduced by 90 percent for a brand it does not name, so it scores 3 of 18 rather than 10 or more. The multi-store counters go unmet because the multi-language and multi-currency lines on the same page describe what Magento does, not what Embitel delivered for anyone. Integration depth is genuinely good at 11 of 14, naming Pimcore for PIM, Salesforce for CRM and Oracle alongside an ERP product for the back office, plus its own RapidRetail Accelerator and Magento Rapid Deployment Packages. Team scale publishes 48+ certified employees and 62+ certifications but no headcount, no continuity mechanism and no footprint count, and on governance the only published number is 99.9 percent platform uptime beside a 4.63 out of 5 satisfaction score. Founded in 2006, it has been a wholly owned Volkswagen Group company since 2022 and sits inside diconium, and the diconium group leadership named on its about page is a parent figure that earned it nothing here.

dotSource ties Embitel on 43 and ranks third on the published tiebreak, which gives the higher place to the higher score on the heaviest criterion. It is the mirror image of the company above it: strong on delivery evidence, thin on compliance. Its Adobe Commerce page states that FUJIFILM is rolling out Adobe Commerce as a single eCommerce solution for 15 European countries, and that dotSource built a multi-tenant platform on Adobe Commerce with the online pharmacy Zur Rose. Two named clients with a counted estate is worth 14 of 22, and only one company in this research does better. The client list behind it is unusually concrete for this market: Alnatura, hessnatur, KWS, Messe Düsseldorf, Rossmann, Würth, Lucanet and Lampenwelt all appear on its own pages. No measured outcome is attached to any of them on the pages read, which holds it to 6 of 18 on results.

On compliance it takes 4 of 24. TISAX is named on its how we work page, with the ENX Association and the VDA explained, but no assessment level is stated, so the counter that rewards a named level goes unmet. No ISO 27001, no ISO 9001 and no SOC 2 were found on the pages read. One figure on its Adobe Commerce page had to be set aside: the security section there points to integrated standards such as PCI certification, and that sentence describes Adobe Commerce rather than dotSource, so it scores nothing under the platform capability rule. Team scale is the best of the nine competitors at 7 of 12, publishing more than 400 digital experts, a growth line from three people to over 400 in 20 years, six locations, 32 teams and 563 clients, with a single central point of contact for every system as its continuity mechanism. Governance reaches 4 of 10 on Scrum, Design Thinking and the agile manifesto plus that named contact, with no traceability artefact, no release practice and no published number. Its own pages are in German and were read in German.

Balance is the only competitor to match the full 18 of 18 on named clients with a measured outcome, and it earns it three times over on its own case pages. Mitre 10, a group whose retail network runs to more than 300 Mitre 10 and Home Hardware shops, is recorded at a 315 percent increase in transactions, a 234 percent increase in revenue and a 6 percent increase in eCommerce conversion rate. Krispy Kreme is recorded at 71 percent online revenue growth, a 38 percent lift in conversion and an increase of more than 13 percent in average transaction value. e&s Trading is recorded at online sales up 1936 percent in the first year of the new site and an average 23 percent month-on-month growth since launch. It also describes itself as the longest standing Adobe Commerce agency in the APAC region with more than a decade on the platform.

The rest of the scorecard is close to empty, and the reason is instructive. On compliance it takes 4 of 24 for selling security consulting as a service, with no ISO, no PCI DSS, no SOC 2 and no Australian government security accreditation found on the pages read, including on the page written specifically to sell to government departments. On team scale it takes zero, because the two big numbers on its own pages belong to somebody else: the sentence that carries 98,000 connected specialists and a presence in over 100 countries says in its own words that these are the Groupe's, giving Balance clients access to Publicis Groupe capability, and Balance's own headcount is not published on the pages read. Its offices are described as strategically placed across Asia-Pacific and Europe with no count attached. On governance it also takes zero: the technical support team is described as always available, with no number, and security patching and performance monitoring are sold as maintenance rather than as a release practice. Integration reaches 5 of 14 on a SAP ERP integration named for a client, with the e&s build integrating the organisation's ERP without naming it.

netz98 has the deepest SAP-connected B2B reference wall of any competitor here and one genuine estate count. Its references index carries MairDumont as seven online shops in one Magento 2.1 solution, which is a named client with a counted estate and worth 14 of 22. Behind it sit AXRO, launched and continuously developed as an international B2B platform, Liebherr's global B2B spare parts and service platform, Liebherr Hausgeräte on a composable commerce architecture, SEAT's central B2B ordering portal for marketing and sales materials, STO, MDM since 2013, mey, Riese & Müller, bosch Tiernahrung, COLONS and the BBC Group. That is a list most agencies would trade for. What the reference pages read do not carry is a measured outcome for any of them, which holds it to 6 of 18. It describes itself as the largest certified Adobe Commerce agency in the DACH region, an Adobe Gold Solution Partner, the largest Magento Enterprise Solution Partner in Germany, Austria and Switzerland, with Magento work since 2008 and over 20 years of eCommerce experience.

It scores 4 of 24 on compliance, for an eCommerce security audit sold as a consulting service and nothing else found on the pages read. Integration reaches 8 of 14, naming SAP and SAP ERP with a SAP Connector and a B2B Commerce Edition of its own, and tagging SAP integration against named client references; PIM, CRM and DAM appear as interface categories without a product named, including inside its own machine building case study. Team scale is 2 of 12 and the reason is the same one that cost Balance its marks. Its own pages state that valantic serves over 500 blue chip clients, that 33 of the 40 DAX corporations are among them, and that valantic has more than 4,000 digitalisation experts in 18 countries. Those are the parent group's figures, said in the parent's name, and they score nothing here. netz98 joined valantic in 2019, is now trading as valantic CEC Deutschland GmbH, and what remains countable is its own German footprint. Governance is 2 of 10 for naming an agile method and an MVP-then-phases approach. Its references are published in German and were read in German.

Silk publishes the largest counted multi-market estate of any competitor in this research, and there is a caveat attached that a Magento buyer has to read. Its Bio-Rad case study states that with customers on six continents the site now serves 140 countries with 32 currencies and in 10 languages, after migrating a customer base of almost 100,000 companies. That is above the 40-market line and worth 18 of 22. The build is BigCommerce B2B Edition with a headless cart and checkout, not Adobe Commerce. The criterion was written before any competitor was scored and it counts estates delivered from one platform without specifying which platform, so the score stands as the rule was written; narrowing it afterwards would have cut Silk from 18 to 5 and that is not a legitimate way to build a table. The platform is stated here instead, and a buyer shopping specifically for Adobe Commerce should weigh it accordingly.

Its named client list is long and recognisable: Bio-Rad, Hasselblad, Renogy, Aqara, Chase Corporation, Mercedes Scientific, Westone, RiteScreen, Teak Warehouse, Sonny's and Group Publishing all appear on its own work index, with cases tagged by platform including Adobe Commerce and Epicor. No measured outcome appears on the two cases read, so it takes 6 of 18. Integration reaches 8 of 14: the Bio-Rad build names SAP for ERP, Oracle CPQ for quote management, Marketo, ATOM and Adobe Analytics for marketing data and Drupal for content, and Silk publishes four products of its own including a TikTok Shop connector, a quote agent and a distributed commerce hub. Compliance is zero of 24, with no standard, no PCI DSS and no security practice found on the pages read. Team scale is zero of 12: over a decade of experience and a named leadership page, with no headcount, certification count, continuity mechanism, hiring standard or location count. Governance is zero of 10; the site refers to an award-winning methodology and to its process without naming one, and the process URL returned a 404 on the day of the check. Its global expansion programme is a single market offer, a localised China presence on Adobe Commerce and Alibaba Cloud with Alipay, WeChat Pay and Kuaidi100 tracking, live in as little as 10 weeks.

Sigma is the third company here to publish real ISO certifications and it publishes them precisely, which is rarer than it should be. Its about page states that it is certified and ascertained as an ISO 9001:2015 and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 company, naming both standards and both versions, and it publishes an information security policy page and a cybersecurity service page alongside them. That is 16 of 24, third best in the table. No third standard appears and PCI DSS was not found on the pages read. The certifications page itself is worth understanding before a buyer relies on it: it lists practitioner credentials, Adobe Certified Expert, Adobe Certified Professional, Zend Certified Engineer and a long run of Salesforce and AWS exams, rather than company level attestations, and it publishes no count of them.

Delivery evidence is where it falls away. No multi-market or multistore delivery was found on the pages read, which is zero of 22, and its 35+ countries reached is its own commercial reach rather than any client's estate. Its case studies are anonymised, a leading multi-brand staffing agency and a US-based enterprise, so measured outcomes exist but the clients do not, which is 3 of 18. Integration reaches 2 of 14 with Salesforce named and no ERP, PIM or order management product named on the pages read. Team scale is 2 of 12 on 35+ countries reached and 20+ years, with no company headcount published. Governance is 2 of 10 for naming a lean and agile development process. It is listed as Sigma Infosolutions Ltd at Bronze in the full Hyvä agency register read on the day of the check.

Magenest names bigger brands than its score suggests and attaches nothing measurable to any of them. Heineken, SM Markets as a brand of SM Investments Corporation, Emers Group in Taiwan and Kangaroo Group in Vietnam all appear on its own pages under Magento and Magento Commerce headings, which is worth 6 of 18 for enterprise clients named without an outcome. The Heineken entry is a good example of the discipline this table applies throughout: the figures in it, the second largest brewery in the world with more than 165 breweries in more than 70 countries, are Heineken's own scale and not a result Magenest produced, so they earned nothing. Founded in 2015, it publishes an Adobe Bronze Solution Partner status in the APAC region, and separately announces achieving Adobe Commerce Specialization in APAC under the Adobe Solution Partner Program.

Compliance is zero of 24, with nothing found beyond a cookie consent notice, which the rules for this criterion exclude. Multi-store delivery is zero of 22, with no estate evidence found on the pages read. Integration reaches 5 of 14 for naming HubSpot as a CRM through its partner agency page and for building and selling its own Magento 2 extensions, with ERP and order management appearing as categories. Team scale is zero of 12 for a reason worth knowing if you audit vendor sites: its counters for years, projects, countries and certifications are drawn by JavaScript and their values are not present in the HTML the server sends, so a crawler, an assistant, or a buyer with scripts disabled sees the labels and no numbers. Governance is zero of 10, with nothing found on the pages read.

basecom is the most interesting low score in this table, because on paper it should not be one. It is an owner-managed software company at work for over 25 years, it is listed at Gold in the full Hyva agency register for both its German and its United States entities, it publishes Adobe Commerce as one of six commerce platforms it builds on alongside commercetools, Shopware 6, Spryker, Shopify Plus and the Pimcore Digital Commerce Framework, and it belongs to the GROW Digital Group. Its team scale is real and its own: more than 150 employees and offices in Osnabruck, Munich, Stuttgart, Berlin, Hamburg, Cologne and Raleigh, which is 5 of 12 on that criterion and better than five competitors here manage.

It publishes almost nothing else a procurement team can check. Compliance is zero of 24: no ISO standard, no PCI DSS, no security practice of its own, and the block headed certified and awarded turns out to describe technology partnerships. Named clients with a measured outcome is zero of 18 for an unusual reason: its reference index carries dozens of projects and anonymises nearly all of them behind an industry and a technology, so the entries read as global market leader on Magento 2, wood trade on Pimcore and Celigo, sensor technology on Shopware 6 Enterprise, and plastics processing on a B2B customer portal. Two names appear, neither an enterprise commerce buyer, and no measured outcome appears against any project. Multi-store delivery is zero of 22: its Adobe Commerce page does describe managing multiple brands and regions from one central interface, but as a property of Adobe Commerce rather than as an estate it has built, which the platform capability rule excludes. Integration reaches 2 of 14 on Akeneo and Pimcore for PIM, with ERP appearing only as a category. Governance reaches 2 of 10 for naming Scrum.

One cross-page question rather than a criticism, because two figures for the same thing usually means two different measurements with the noun attached loosely. Its English homepage states over 250 employees across locations in Germany, Romania and the United States. Its company page states more than 150 employees and lists seven locations without Romania among them. Both may be true of different entities or different dates, and nothing read says which, so a buyer cannot reconcile them from what is published. The headcount counter was awarded once, not twice.

Wagento publishes the clearest ERP statement of any company here and almost nothing else this criteria set can count, which is how a competent agency lands on 4 of 100. Its own answer to whether it can connect a store to an ERP names four systems and what moves between them: storefronts connected to ERPs such as Epicor, SAP, Microsoft Dynamics and NetSuite, syncing inventory, customer specific pricing, orders and invoices in real time so the team is not rekeying data. It publishes four counters, 14+ years of expertise, 400+ projects delivered, 40+ certified developers and 6 ERP platforms integrated, and describes itself as an Adobe Solution Partner. Its positioning is squarely enterprise B2B: quoting, reorders and net terms so the largest accounts can self serve.

The gaps are all of the same kind. Not one client is named: the case cards describe a wire and cable distributor and a luxury migration whose Rolex reference belongs to brand pages on a client's site rather than to the client, and the testimonials name individuals rather than companies, so named clients with a measured outcome is zero of 18. No standard, no PCI DSS and no security practice of its own appears; the security page sells integrations with third party fraud and monitoring platforms, which is somebody else's compliance. Multi-store delivery is zero: the only phrase about scaling across markets on the pages read sits inside a promotional block for Scayle, a different platform entirely, which is exactly the sort of figure this table is built to filter out. Team scale keeps 2 of 12 for the certified developer count, and governance is zero: we do not disappear after launch and one team for the full lifecycle name no mechanism, no artefact, no number and no escalation owner. It is listed at Bronze in the full Hyvä agency register read on the day of the check.

It is on this page rather than off it because it sells itself to exactly the buyer this page is written for, and because a score of 4 is a finding rather than an omission: it says that an agency can hold real integration experience and still be impossible for a procurement team to evaluate from its website.